European Businesses Says China Breaks Trade Rules

อ่านหัวข้อก่อนหน้า อ่านหัวข้อถัดไป Go down

European Businesses Says China Breaks Trade Rules

ตั้งหัวข้อ  sunny on Sun Sep 05, 2010 3:21 pm

A European business group has accused the Chinese government of failing to honor promises to the World Trade Organization - a policy it says has effectively barred European companies from key markets. The European Chamber of Commerce in China is also urging Beijing to level the playing field for its members and other foreign companies.

In its annual China Position Paper, the business association details what it describes as the protectionist hurdles still impeding foreign businesses almost a decade after China joined the World Trade Organization. The complaints echo those made by American business leaders earlier this year.

Europe wants to help China by investing more in the country, said chamber president Jacques de Boisseson. But he added, China shuts out foreign businesses by flouting WTO rules and his group has not ruled out going to the WTO to lodge a complaint.

"Bringing a case to WTO panel is a sort of last recourse tool, which I hope we won't have to use," said de Boisseson. "I think the best way is to increase dialogue."

Among the group's complaints are restrictions on access to such sectors as telecommunications and airline reservations. Mr. de Boisseson thinks China's leaders are taking notice of the complaints foreign businesses have.

"I have had the sense in the last six months that our concerns and comments are being heard by the Chinese," he said. "This is relatively new. I think the Chinese are aware they have things to correct."

The European Union's foreign policy chief met with Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao Thursday and urged him to create a better investment environment for European businesses.

The EU Chamber paper highlights the use of red tape and regulations to bar foreign companies - especially in bidding for government procurement contracts, a key part of China's state-controlled economy.

VOA News

_________________
ท้องทะเลและมหาสมุทร ไม่เคยปราศจากคลื่นฉันใด
มนุษย์อยู่ร่วมในสังคมเดียวกัน โดยความคิดเห็นที่แตกต่างกัน ย่อมสร้างผลกระทบต่อสังคมได้ฉันนั้น

sunny

จำนวนข้อความ : 3511
Registration date : 28/06/2008

ดูข้อมูลส่วนตัว

ขึ้นไปข้างบน Go down

Re: European Businesses Says China Breaks Trade Rules

ตั้งหัวข้อ  sunny on Thu Sep 16, 2010 12:09 am

How do you ease the pain of losing a job?

Are there any economic statistics more offensive than those related to unemployment?

Whether they are reported as fractions of percentages or in nice rounded-out numbers, up or down, they can never ever tell the individual story of tragedy and disappointment that losing a job means. Nor can they hint at the changes to society caused by wide-scale joblessness.

This is especially true in a recession when people become unemployed by the million. The personal side hardly gets a look in when the numbers are as bad - and confusing - as they are at the moment in both the US and the UK.

In America, the unemployment rate in August was 9.6%. In the UK, the stats are compiled quarterly and were last published in June.

Unemployment then stood at 7.8%. Grim numbers, confusing spin: the rate is falling - not fast enough for large numbers of new jobs to be created. It's all bad - but not as fast as analysts feared. The markets rose on the news - it's all good.

Lost in the confusion is the supreme number from the US: between December 2007 and March 2009, 5.1 million Americans lost their jobs. It's a big country but that is a huge shock to the system. It is easier to compile statistics measuring the size of the shock than to build a picture of how that has changed society.

Emotive issue

A reasonable guess would be that the whipsawing nature of contemporary American politics: Barack Obama elected president followed by the inexorable rise of the Tea Party, and the palpable feeling of angry despair in much of the country that politicians are having to appease can be traced to the loss of so many jobs in such a short period of time.

Curiously, joblessness is a much more emotive issue today in America than in Britain. Possibly because unions are so weak in the US. A mere 7% of American workers belong to a union compared with close to 25% in Britain. As this week's Trade Union Congress annual conference demonstrates, unions offer a constructive channel to focus anger at mass lay-offs.

Another reason inchoate rage is more prevalent in America during this downturn is because the social safety net is thinner. Unemployment compensation - the dole - has, for a very long time, been paid for just 26 weeks. In the current climate, Congress has authorised special payments that allow the very long-term unemployed up to 99 weeks of payments - but only after a nasty battle.

The dole is pretty much it on the benefits front and, as most workers who have been laid off will tell you, it is something they paid for anyway in payroll taxes when they were employed - so what kind of benefit is it anyway?

In Britain the calculations are more complex, but there is a wider variety of help available for the long-term unemployed. This, too, may help ease the pain of losing a job. Then there is the fact that unemployment carries a greater stigma in America then in Britain. Sympathy for losing your job runs out faster than unemployment benefits in the US.

Re-invent yourself

One part of America's myth about itself is that you pick yourself up when you lose your job, move on and start over. Previous big economic downturns have seen mass population shifts. In the 1930s, California's population swelled with migrants from the Plains States - the Dust Bowl - and deprived areas in cities on the East Coast.

In the 1970s, the great heavy industries along the Great Lakes went through a massive contraction. The term Rust Belt came into being to describe the region. People had to move on. The population growth of the American South and Southwest dates from this time.

The problem in the current downturn is there is no place left to go.

California is full - and broke. Las Vegas and Greater Phoenix are full of empty sub-prime financed houses waiting to be repossesed. So now what to do? Start your own business.

In an interesting essay published in The New York Times last June, the former Clinton administration Secretary of Labor, Robert Reich, noted a recent report that showed 2009 - when America was still in recession, with bank lending depressed - saw business start-ups reaching a 14-year high, greater even than in the technology boom of the late 90s.

The explanation for this counterintuitive number was simple, according to Mr Reich. Many people who have lost their jobs have had to re-invent themselves by starting consultant businesses with one employee: themselves. So, basically, they are doing the same work they did before but on a part-time basis.

Part-time solution

Self-employment among people between the ages of 55 and 64 in 2009 was up 5% on the previous year; for over 65s it was up 29%. Why are 65s being measured? Well, a great many people found that their private pensions were seriously devalued when the stock market tanked during the worst days of the banking crisis and they simply don't have enough money to retire.

The part-time solution has taken hold in Britain, as well. It is currently at an all-time high. More than a million people who want full-time work are currently in part-time employment. In the reported last quarter, part-time employment rose by 117,000 and self-employment by 59,000. As for solutions, today, more than at any time in the past 30 years, there is a marked difference in the way the governments in Britain and America choose to address a jobs crisis.

Since Labor Day, President Obama has made employment his focus. He announced a $50bn plan to rebuild America's crumbling transport infrastructure. Now all he needs is for Congress to approve it.

Meanwhile in Britain, there is no plan for more spending to stimulate employment. Instead government departments are finishing up their reports for Chancellor of the Exchequer George Osborne's autumn spending review. He is demanding cuts of between 25% and 40% from each department. Those are just numbers. The cuts mean big job losses - the fastest-growing employment sector in Britain in recent years has been government work.

It is not likely to be clear any time soon which approach works best to get people back on the job. The IMF and the International Labor Organization published a report on global unemployment this week. It described a global "wasteland of unemployment." The report emphasises the grimmest statistic: 210 million people unemployed around the world.

Against such a frightening number it is impossible for one single government's approach to joblessness to work. Globalisation doesn't just connect businesses, it connects the workers who make things as well. The problem cannot adequately be expressed in statistics. The human response to this plague of joblessness is frightening to contemplate.

Michael Goldfarb is a journalist and broadcaster who has lived in London since 1985. Formerly with National Public Radio, he is now the London correspondent of globalpost.com.

_________________
ท้องทะเลและมหาสมุทร ไม่เคยปราศจากคลื่นฉันใด
มนุษย์อยู่ร่วมในสังคมเดียวกัน โดยความคิดเห็นที่แตกต่างกัน ย่อมสร้างผลกระทบต่อสังคมได้ฉันนั้น

sunny

จำนวนข้อความ : 3511
Registration date : 28/06/2008

ดูข้อมูลส่วนตัว

ขึ้นไปข้างบน Go down

อ่านหัวข้อก่อนหน้า อ่านหัวข้อถัดไป ขึ้นไปข้างบน


 
Permissions in this forum:
คุณไม่สามารถพิมพ์ตอบ